Wednesday, April 14, 2010

Did you catch this on Rush?

You may have missed this on the Rush Limbaugh show today.  He made reference to the following US Today article:
The article talks about plans from the White House in the case of a nuclear attack.  The article starts off with:
The White House has warned state and local governments not to expect a "significant federal response" at the scene of a terrorist nuclear attack for 24 to 72 hours after the blast

Rush mused about the idea that it could take up to 3 days for people to get help after a major disaster in this country.  He wondered what the people in New Orleans would think about that.

0 comments:

Post a Comment

About this Blog

Barack Obama was elected with the promise of "hope and change". The problem with this is that the change that he hopes to bring about is not what most of America really wants. He didn't lie about the changes he was bringing. American voters just didn't listen.


This blog is dedicated to highlighting the "change" that Barack Obama is bringing to this great country of ours and why it is wrong . First, and foremost, we cannot afford it. We cannot afford to mortgage our children's and grandchildren's futures. It is wrong for us to burden them with this debt for our gratification, all under the banner of "hope and change". When we hear of doubling the national debt in 5 years and tripling it in 10 we should think, this isn't right, this isn't fair to them.

Passing on their debts to the next generation would be forcing the children of the future to be born into a certain amount of bondage or involuntary servitude - something for which they had neither voted nor subscribed. It would be, in a very literal sense, "taxation without representation."

from The 5000 Year Leap by W. Cleon Skousen on the Founding Fathers principle of Avoiding the Burden of Debt